NBCS supports calls for collaboration in fight aga... » “We couldn’t agree more with the recent comments made by Georgina Barnard, TP Crime Reduction & Part... British Personnel return home from campaign in Afg... » The final UK service personnel have left Kandahar Airfield in southern Afghanistan after completing ... ASC Business Group: Adapt quickly to minimise clou... » Organisations embracing cloud-based security management systems will see major benefits but must ada... Global maritime security market to grow to $20.87 ... » The recent report by Markets and Markets reveals that in the next five years the maritime security m... Brainloop solves “Dropbox Dilemma” facing UK busin... » London: Brainloop has launched its portfolio of simple, secure, collaboration tools into the UK to a... New Google web app security scanner + 95% of XSS w... » In light of Google's announcement about releasing an open source tool for testing web app security s... Datum Datacentres builds on its success » Datum Datacentres, the Farnborough-based business-critical co-location data centre provider, is deli... Olive Communications' Safetybank wins SaaS Produ... » Olive Communications' digital safety management platform, Safetybank, was recognised as the SaaS (So... BSI Standards Awards recognizes outstanding c... » BSI, the UK’s National Standards Body has officially recognized the outstanding contributions of its... Gartner names proofpoint a leader in 2014 Magic ... » London, UK: Proofpoint, Inc. has been positioned by Gartner, Inc. in the leaders quadrant of the 201...

CLICK HERE TO

Advertise with Vigilance

Got News?

Got news for Vigilance?

Have you got news/articles for us? We welcome news stories and articles from security experts, intelligence analysts, industry players, security correspondents in the main stream media and our numerous readers across the globe.

READ MORE

Subscribe to Vigilance Weekly

Information Security Header

Many recognise that the internet is an insecure place to be, but sometimes the browser itself can heighten this likelihood. In his latest blog post, Jonathan Kuskos WhiteHat's A-Team Application Security Engineer, warns to the danger of an unconventional attack in Firefox (versions 21 and below) - Cross Site Request Forgery.

In his commentary, Jonathan:

Explains ‘Cross Site Request Forgery’

Explains ‘verb tampering’

Uses examples to show how this attack works

Warns that, while Firefox 22 has been patched, previous versions remain vulnerable - highlighting the issue that users should update browsers to remain secure

 

It appears that an unconventional method of Cross Site Request Forgery may be made exploitable by using Firefox versions 21 and below. The exploit requires that the target application be first vulnerable to HEAD request verb tampering, which is where a HEAD verb(also commonly known as 'method') is supplied in place of a GET or POST, and is successfully processed by the application. Once this is found, an XMLHttpRequest(commonly abbreviated to 'XHR') request can be sent from an off-domain location with the .open() method invoked and HEAD supplied as the verb.

The XMLHttpRequest Living Standard specifications can be found here and defines how XHR objects should be used. Although there are many rules, steps 3 and 4 of the .send() method serve particular interest to this implementation error:

.send(data);

3) If the request method is GET or HEAD, set data to null.

4) If data is null, do not include a request entity body and go to the next step.

Consider the following very basic and elementary Proof of Concept:

If you monitor your traffic or catch this in an intercepting proxy, you will see a request being made to https://www.whitehatsec.com with post data "foo=bar", even though the request verb is HEAD. According to step 3 above, 'data' should have been set to 'NULL'. This behavior seems to only occur in Firefox; The latest versions(as of this writing) of Internet Explorer, Chrome, Safari, and Opera are all successfully practicing proper .send() implementation.

I notified Mozilla of this behavior and a patch has been implemented into the v22 build. Until then Firefox 21 and those that refuse to ever update their browser will remain susceptible targets. It requires a bit of a "perfect storm" scenario, but nonetheless the second most widely used browser in the world should never ineptly contribute to CSRF.